The National Novel Writing Month (NaNoWriMo) organization has sparked controversy by defending the use of AI writing tools. In a recent statement, NaNoWriMo argued that condemning AI would be classist and ableist. The organization believes that not all writers have the same abilities or financial means to hire human writing assistants.
They stated that AI tools can help reduce these barriers and provide support to writers who may need it. However, many in the writing community have strongly criticized NaNoWriMo’s stance. Bestselling authors and former NaNoWriMo board members have resigned in protest.
Daniel José Older, a lead story architect for Star Wars: The High Republic, argued that generative AI empowers the tech industry rather than artists. He believes it steals existing content to create new material in a “Frankensteinian” manner.
Ai stirs NaNoWriMo controversy
Other authors, such as Cass Morris, have also stepped down from NaNoWriMo’s writers board. They argue that AI platforms are unethical and rob writers of the opportunity to develop their own voices. Longtime NaNoWriMo participants have expressed frustration and betrayal as well.
Some believe the organization is disregarding public sentiment about AI and masking their stance with politically correct language. In response to the backlash, NaNoWriMo updated its statement to acknowledge concerns about the impact of generative AI on the writing industry. They clarified that they are troubled by situational abuse of AI that conflicts with their values.
The controversy reflects a broader debate over the role of AI in creative fields. Strong opinions exist on both sides regarding its potential and ethical implications. As AI continues to evolve, organizations like NaNoWriMo will need to navigate these complex issues and their impact on the writing community.
